visual basic powerpacks visual studio 2017 download

Gets or sets the file name of an Encapsulated PostScript file and the path to which the file will be saved when the PrintAction property is set to PrintToFile. Gets or sets a PrinterSettings object that you can use to specify various properties of a printer. Gets or sets a value indicating whether the output is directed to a printer, to a print preview window, or to a file.

Gets or sets the document name to display (for example, in a print status dialog box or printer queue) while printing the document. Initializes a new instance of the PrintForm class, specifying the IContainer in which it will be parented. Initializes a new instance of the PrintForm class, specifying the Form where it will be parented. Initializes a new instance of the PrintForm class. Namespace: Assembly: (in .dll) Inheritance Hierarchy Besides, if I just get a proof that it is redistributable, then all this trouble is saved (I can simply package it and my users dont have any action).Enables printing an image of a Windows Form at run time. Although this sounds straight forward, my users will not find it easy because its not straight forward for them. The only option remains is, don't package the DLL and ask my product user to go to download link, and install it themselves. So basically i have no proof from Microsoft that this dll can be redistributed. The post mentions '' link, this link is not opening. Unless i show a substantial proof from Microsoft, my organization will not allow me to redistribute this DLL/package to customer. This particular thing is not written anywhere.

I want a substantial post from Microsoft that says the download package it self can be packaged as part of my product, OR the DLL can be shipped directly (as a re-distributable). As mentioned before, I don't need the DLL or the download package, but a proof, whether the DLL can be redistributed. Really Appreciate the help you are providing.

Visual basic powerpacks visual studio 2017 download